Inspirational stories / Inspirational true stories about education

education mentorship · 5 min read

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Faced Closed Doors in Law. Allies Helped Her Open Them.

Shut out of many legal jobs, Ruth Bader Ginsburg found allies, wrote a key Supreme Court brief with a colleague and built a wider fight for equal rights.

A symbolic illustration of a shared law-library worktable with unmarked brief pages, pencils, law books and two empty chairs; no specific person or historical scene is depicted.
Generated symbolic editorial illustration; it does not depict Ginsburg, an actual brief, or a documented historical scene. Generated symbolic editorial illustration; it does not depict Ginsburg, an actual brief, or a documented historical scene.

The lesson

Closed doors are easier to open when other people push with you.

  • Let the people who believe in you speak up for you.
  • Build your work around the real problems people bring to you.
  • Give credit to the people who did the work before you.

The challenge

Ruth Bader Ginsburg wanted to be a lawyer. She studied at Harvard Law School. When her husband, Martin, took a job in New York, she moved to Columbia Law School. She graduated tied for first in her class.

That was an excellent record. But in her time, a great record was not enough for a woman in law.

The problem

Decades later, Ginsburg described the doors that closed on her. She recalled that Justice Felix Frankfurter would not hire a woman as his clerk. A clerk is a lawyer who helps a judge. She said Judge Learned Hand also explained why he would not hire her.

She remembered law-firm job sheets marked "men only." She named three things that counted against her: being Jewish, being a woman and being a mother.

She later said she worked one summer at a law firm, but it did not offer her a permanent job. She linked that to the firm offering a job to Pauli Murray.

So even a top student had trouble finding work.

What they did

Ginsburg did not open the first door alone. A Columbia professor, Gerald Gunther, spoke up for her.

Gunther later described what happened in a 1993 letter supporting her nomination. He said Judge Edmund Palmieri hesitated to hire a woman clerk. Gunther urged him to think again. Palmieri hired Ginsburg, and she clerked for him from 1959 to 1961.

Next, Ginsburg taught law at Rutgers from 1963 to 1972. The barriers did not vanish. She later recalled being paid less than male colleagues because her husband had a good job.

Her focus grew step by step. She did legal research in Sweden that compared laws across countries. People with sex discrimination complaints also brought them to her through the New Jersey branch of the ACLU. These real cases pulled her toward women's rights.

Then came a big case, Reed v. Reed. An Idaho law said that when courts chose someone to handle a dead person's property, men must be preferred over women. Sally Reed challenged that law.

Ginsburg and Mel Wulf, the ACLU's legal director, wrote the brief together. A brief is the written argument sent to the court. Sally Reed's own lawyer from Boise, Allen R. Derr, argued the case in person.

Ginsburg also added two earlier women's-rights lawyers to the brief: Pauli Murray and Dorothy Kenyon. A law review tribute says they had not formally worked on the case. She included them to honor the work they had done before her.

Timeline: Harvard and Columbia study, 1956–59; Palmieri clerkship, 1959–61; Rutgers and ACLU work, 1963–72; Reed and Women’s Rights Project milestones, 1971–72; Supreme Court arguments, 1973–78; United States v. Virginia, 1996. It separates the project’s 1971 vote from Ginsburg’s fall 1972 start.

Key steps in Ginsburg's path. The ACLU voted to start its project in 1971; she began leading it in fall 1972.

What happened next

The Supreme Court ruled for Sally Reed. All the justices agreed that Idaho's rule favoring men broke the promise of equal protection under the law.

The win was important, but it was one step. A stronger legal test for laws that treat men and women differently came later. The ACLU points to a 1976 case, Craig v. Boren, as the one that set that test.

After Reed, the ACLU board voted at the end of 1971 to start a Women's Rights Project. Ginsburg recalled that the board asked her to lead it. In fall 1972, she began splitting her time between Columbia and the ACLU.

From 1973 to 1978, she argued six cases before the Supreme Court and won five. She lost one, Kahn v. Shevin. She later said she thought that case came too soon. The work moved forward case by case, with wins and losses.

In 1996, Justice Ginsburg wrote the Supreme Court's main opinion in United States v. Virginia. The Court held that the Virginia Military Institute could not shut out all women. It also said the state's separate program for women did not fix the problem.

This story inspires because so many people moved it forward. A professor spoke up. A judge changed his mind. Clients brought real problems. Lawyers wrote and argued together, and earlier women got the credit they had earned.

Each ruling had limits, and hard work could not promise any single job or win. But together, these steps opened doors that had been shut.

Try this today

  • Think of someone who could speak up for you. Send them a short note about one goal you are working toward.
  • Write down one problem a friend, customer or neighbor has told you about. Note one small way your skills could help.
  • Thank someone whose earlier work made your path easier. Name exactly what they did.

Who has opened a door for you, and whose door could you help open?

Sources for this story: S01, S02, S03, S04, S05, S07, S08, S09, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14. Full list below.

Join the conversation

Vote in the community poll and see the latest results from Armored Kitten on Telegram.

Share this story with someone

XFacebookWhatsAppTelegramLinkedInRedditEmail

Sources and further reading

  1. [S01] Ruth Bader Ginsburg Interview 3Historical Society of the D.C. Circuit · Transcript pp. 78–85 / page lines 132–175
  2. [S02] Ruth Bader GinsburgAmerican Academy of Achievement · American Academy of Achievement interview, education section and lines 287–294
  3. [S03] Gerald Gunther recommendation letter for Ruth Bader GinsburgClinton White House archive · Gunther letter, lines 194–214
  4. [S04] Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Visits GWGeorge Washington University Law · GW Law report, lines 506–521
  5. [S05] Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971)Supreme Court of the United States (opinion text hosted by Justia) · Syllabus lines 69–72; opinion lines 121–126
  6. [S07] The History of the ACLU Women’s Rights ProjectAmerican Civil Liberties Union · Page 1, lines 1–22
  7. [S08] United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996)Supreme Court of the United States (opinion text hosted by Justia) · Syllabus lines 112–114; conclusion lines 374–375
  8. [S09] Without Great Expectations, Ginsburg Found Her Way to TopLos Angeles Times · Los Angeles Times, lines 252–258 and 287–295
  9. [S10] Ruth Bader Ginsburg Litigating Against Gender DiscriminationHistorical Society of the New York Courts · Pages 54–56 / PDF lines 2639–2737
  10. [S11] U.S. Supreme Court Cases: Ruth Bader GinsburgNational Archives · Page 1, opening paragraph
  11. [S12] Ruth Bader Ginsburg Interview 4Historical Society of the D.C. Circuit · Interview 4, pp. 119–120 / lines 121–151
  12. [S13] U.S. Reports: Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971)U.S. Government Publishing Office (GovInfo) · PDF p. 0, lines 12–16
  13. [S14] Lessons Learned from Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgColumbia Law Review · Paragraph beginning “Justice Ginsburg also acutely appreciated,” lines 119–121

Keep reading